Comments on: Upper Deck Signs Pete Rose

By: WP Themes

WP Themes — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:16:36 +0000

Nice brief and this post helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you for your information.

By: ~ Ross

~ Ross — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:36:40 +0000

My guess would be the fact that he is the all time hit king not to mention the way he played the game.

By: First Year

First Year — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:59:20 +0000

I never really understood why Rose was so popular with collectors. I mean, he’s a superstar so he should be up there. But it seems like he’s as popular as, say, Mantle or Griffey.

By: ~ Ross

~ Ross — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:09:06 +0000

Thats a good question… I assume it depends on how much Rose has signed in the past as well as how much he will be signing for UD. Either way, like you said it’s a start I suppose.

By: Dinged Corners

Dinged Corners — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:54:31 +0000

Well, UD has to do SOMETHING to fill the void; signing a disgraced gambler is a start. But won’t that bring down the value of his other autographs in time?